Home » Posts tagged 'ccfc stuart'
Tag Archives: ccfc stuart
News From Weightier Matter Family Court Litigant Resources
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
The Soft Eugenics of Dark Hearts and Low Minds: Highly Educated, Wealthy Family Court Elites of the Domestic Distpute Industry Criminal Enterprise: Shaping a Future Safe-for Their Crime
Feminine Justice: Cease and Desist Letter to Former Family Division Head Lorna Alksne
CCFC’s recently filed federal RICO lawsuit
details allegations of a racketeering crime ring harming parents and children throughout California. The perpetrators? Not pin-stripped gangsters, ponzi backroom scams, or heady leathered street thugs, but a gang of thugs nonetheless. Prominent members of our own communities; Lawyers, psychologists, and even our own judiciary. The letters below, based on the Alksne template, detail the bigotry, fraud, discrimination, and rampant lawlessness occurring under the noses of San Diego Superior Court judges. CCFC has called the criminal behavior to their attention, to the attention of the District Attorney and the United States Attorney for this federal district. None have responded, leading CCFC to file a civil rights lawsuit in US District Court for the Southern District of California. CCFC’s August 21, 2013 press release details further allegations here.
CCFC Alksne (the model for all letters below)
“Family Man”: San Diego Family Division Judge Michael Groch–a Gay Single Male Angering San Diego Families
Its All About the Kids
Oddly, Family Court is set aside for the “sensitive issues” it handles; parent-child relationships, careers, often sanity, and sometimes even lives. Those assigned to the court are expected to execute a special level of care, compassion, and concern. For that reason women are disproportionately represented, under the impression that they are “kinder” and “gentler.” The court has at least one gay male–perhaps for the same bizarre rationalization.
But their performance is anything but kind–parents are regularly subjected to a highly invasive judicial microscope of “soft eugenics”–Judges probing to reward or punish the existence or absence of arbitrary parental behaviors and personalities a given judge likes or dislikes–virtually all of which have nothing to do with even the lowest test of “legitimate state interests.” A parent is wealthy? Great! Cash machine. Unusually neat? Sounds: A: irrational obsessive-compulsive or B: responsible law abiding citizen. (Check only one please). Parent is just like me? Parent of the Year! She gets everything.
We Know the Law About Families
And who’s making those studied, well-researched, virtually certain stare decisis judgments of the values and behaviors of others they’ve barely met? Former prosecutor-types who couldn’t make it throwing virtually defenseless California criminals in jail. Banished to Family Court, they appear more successful. Just don’t tell them that the prey in family court have even fewer defenses from arbitrary judgment, punishment, and “kinder” scorn. Unleash the talents of a hangman to a waiting room of patients awaiting brain surgery–Why would we be surprised that we end up with a post-op piled with bloodied corpses?
Just…. Be More Like Us!
The rank and file judges–often not even parents themselves–are plagued with horrific personality defects of their own far more serious than any parent in their courtroom–personal and professional misconduct, multiple divorcees, serious domestic violence perpetrators, addicts, some near perversions, financial misdealing, abundant disregard for the rule of law–and disdain for anyone who disagrees. Good old fashioned thuggery by a rogues gallery of unethical lawyers, judges, and psychologists in what has become a free-for-all crime ring.
As detailed in our lawsuit and soon to come to light, the “special forum” of family court has become “special”–for criminals intent on taking advantage of vulnerable, unsophisticated legal consumers in turmoil, strife, and now even more serious jeopardy.
And how do they regard parents in crisis? “They’re all animals” says one notable family court psychologist, Stephen Doyne.
“As we express our gratitude, we must never forget that the highest appreciation is not to utter words, but to live by them.”
John F. Kennedy
San Diego Family Court “Parent Evaluator” Stephen Doyne Sued for Federal Criminal Racketeering for Fraud and Abuse of Dozens of His San Diego Clients: Yet still working for the Court. In his care clients have murdered their children, committed suicide, been thrown in jail, targeted by him for false child abuse allegations, disbarred, bankrupted, ruined careers, homeless, and rivers of pain. His response: “They’re all animals.”
We’re Only Trying To Help You
If you’re in family court, be aware that it’s anything but family friendly. Parents had no input–no input whatsoever–in it’s creation, rules, and operation. It was created and operated by divorce lawyers and Sacramento professional bureaucrats with a jobs agenda–theirs instead of yours or your children’s. If you’re lucky enough to be the beneficiary on the political side of their agenda–yes, political agenda in a family court–that strongly favors women, feminists, gays–you may take some comfort that the killing machine is working for you. That is, until it comes for you. CCFC’s membership is replete with mothers, sisters, and daughters who’ve been duped into trusting, and then outright raped by those who claim to be acting in their interest. Our Cease and Desist letter examines the history, writings, and workings of the court and its supporters such as the Family Justice Center, and the evidence is stunning. Exhibit “B” to the Family Justice Center letter sets the evidence forth in graphic detail.
Family Justice Center Founder Casey Gwin: “You’re Feminism on Steroids!” ~ Feminist Visionary Ellen Pence
We Can Assure Your Safety
The only safe move–we suggest avoiding it altogether if possible. Free resources like UpToParents and TransParenting are far more effective, safe, and free. If your attorney doesn’t offer it, or suggests you’ll “do better” fighting, get ready; you’re the next meal on their table.
Some doubt the safety of encouraging cooperative resolution of domestic disputes, arguing that its “risky” trying to bring a feuding couple together lest the man “returns to his abuse.” For a very few men and women–perhaps. But the question to ask is “riskier than what?” The Alliance’s track record with heavy-handed family court judges in San Diego alone is storied with murdered spouses, children, suicides, exacerbated addictions, serious violence, death threats, false arrests, manipulation of police and child welfare agencies, physical attacks, theft, and character/career assassinations–the question is, Alliance: “If fostering domestic cooperation out of strife is risky, then how would you describe fostering its warfare?”
A Judge’s Judgment: Former Family Court Judge Lisa Schall Placed On Sensitive Family Court Matters After Three Serious Judicial Ethics Violations, Including Reckless Drunk Driving, and Dozens of Litigant Complaints.
What’s going wrong here?
How have we reached a point at which entrusted officials, sworn to oaths to exercise their power only as it is delegated to them; to check themselves and others in its improper use; to enforce the law equally without regard to friend or foe; to obey the law themselves first and foremost, have been led so astray? Knowledge of how to prohibit the inevitable abuse of power and the decay it inevitably results in, goes stale while the blood of victims overflows its cup? Duties to abide by oaths to restrain the power of government are uttered in mocking tones once power is secured behind the hoods and robes of immunity from law? How is it that those entrusted with enforcing laws on themselves and others in power so regularly cast themselves as the most notorious criminals in the courthouse? How is it that intelligent people, taught the law, learned in the history of tyranny and oppression our nation was founded to temper and diffuse, schooled in ethics and moral philosophy, of innate human dignity, equal opportunity, and the terror to which power, politics, and greed can quickly devolve into, so blithely ignore what they’ve so well learned?
We’re Judges–We Know Better About
Your Kids Than You
Given the trust and power to protect those liberties, expand opportunities, develop tolerance, and grow the common wealth, how do such people so quickly convert those powers to condemn, restrict, and oppress the very communities they’re entrusted to support? How have they become converted from a deep awareness of the values and wisdom of “equality” into proponents of rampant partisanship, nepotism, lawlessness, and short-sighted gain for a cherished constituency?
What forces intelligent, learned, experienced people like Lorna Alksne, Michael Groch, Lisa Schall, Stephen Doyne, Casey Gwinn, Jan Goldsmith, and so many others in our community to revert to pre-American rogue-like abuse of the “accidents of birth”; sycophancy and bluster begetting pedestal vanity, mantle entitlements, and their companion piqueish egos?
If We Can’t Do Something Right… What The Hell-Let’s See What Happens!
How have they forgotten the age-old Hippocratic Oath to “above all else, do no harm?” We hire prosecutors for specific purposes–to punish criminals, but in civil and family court, how is that instinct relevant? How is it anything other than a defect? The result–the incompetent’s lack of necessary problem-solving mentality, negotiation skills, and real-client experience is converted into your crime. “Do it our way or else.” Now that’s legal talent!
They learned such skills in law school and have had opportunities to develop them, but they chose blunt force objects of handcuffs and an elaborate boudoir of King’s clothing. Have the skills gone rusty from disuse? No need to negotiate when you have all the guns. Have they forgotten–perhaps the tax-subsidized educations they were bought have betrayed them. Yet they’re educated at some of the world’s finest institutions. Desperation to earn a living? Not unless earning more than 95% of Americans makes you destitute. How can so many so easily turn their back on what they know to be their duties, making choices that reflect so poorly on the opportunities to expand for others the blessings they’ve been so fortunate to enjoy? Are they secretly on the take? Psychopathology? Just plain evil?
“Any man can withstand adversity. If you really want to test a man’s character, give him power.” ~Abraham Lincoln
What’s going wrong here?
Hon. Joel Wohlfeil; One of the Few Family Court Judges Without A Hangman’s Background; As a civil lawyer his background was money. Good thing too. The experience has come in handy in establishing and operating Family Court’s private for-profit forensic psychology enterprise of custody evaluators. Is it “Hon.” or “Herr.” C.O.O.?
Good questions, and as our lawsuit progresses, we’re likely to have some very specific answers to share with you right here, so stay tuned. The hangman wears a hood of anonymity–the judge wears a robe of immunity. Unhooded, uncloaked, and no longer protected by the manufactured fiction of inability to sin, the real person stands before God and woman to answer for her crime. The verdict on sin will await a higher court.
“Man is the only animal that blushes. Or needs to.”
~- Mark Twain Following the Equator
In the meantime we encourage your feedback and attention to these critical issues affecting parents and children throughout California and our nation. Please feel free to join us in demanding more–much, much more–from your elected judiciary, paid legal representatives, non-profit public welfare agencies, and those entrusted with the care and well-being of our entire community–not just those they want to win. Your liberties, the liberties of those you know and love, and perhaps even one day the liberties of your own children and grandchildren hang in the balance. Don’t allow them to slip.
Good luck parents.
Visit our Facebook Page at https://www.facebook.com/CCFCONLINE
California Coalition for Families and Children, PBC 